Ⓒⓗⓐⓡⓛⓔⓝⓔ'ⓢ Ⓟⓛⓐⓨⓖⓡⓞⓤⓝⓓ

我覺得「道德兩難」這類的文章滿適合的 這種文章的討論性很強，在不同背景成長的孩子會有不同看法 當然這也沒有所謂最標準的答案，學生可以自由的發表意見， 也可以激發他們思考自己同意或不同意的立場與論點 以下是一個道德兩難的實例! 歐洲有個婦人患了癌症，生命垂危。醫生認為只有一種藥能救她，就是本城一個藥劑師最近發明的鐳。製造這種藥要花很多錢，藥劑師索價還要高過成本十倍。他花了200元製造鐳，而這點藥他竟索價2000元。病婦的丈夫海因茲到處向熟人借錢，一共才借得1000元，只夠藥費的一半。海因茲不得已，只好告 訴藥劑師，他的妻子快要死了，請求藥劑師便宜一點賣給他，或者允許他賒欠。但藥劑師說："不成，我發明此藥就是為了賺錢。" 海因茲走投無路竟撬開商店的門，為妻子偷來了藥。 (來源:http://mypaper.pchome.com.tw/ploki/post/1321805241) 這時就可以問學生: 你們覺得海因茲偷藥的行為正確嗎? 為什麼? 或者是一些小篇的文學作品，例如：詩， 因為對詩的解釋可以很多樣化，每個人都有每個人自己的解釋，沒有所謂對錯 （畢竟沒有辦法問到作者他的本意） 學生也同樣能深度思考自己為什麼如何思考，要用什麼論點說服其他人 以下是另一個實例! The Road Not Taken by Robert Frost Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, And sorry I could not travel both And be one traveler, long I stood And looked down one as far as I could To where it bent in the undergrowth; Then took the other, as just as fair, And having perhaps the better claim Because it was grassy and wanted wear, Though as for that the passing there Had worn them really about the same, And both that morning equally lay In leaves no step had trodden black. Oh, I marked the first for another day! Yet knowing how way leads on to way I doubted if I should ever come back. I shall be telling this with a sigh Somewhere ages and ages hence: Two roads diverged in a wood, and I, I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference. (來源: http://www.poemhunter.com/poem/the-road-not-taken/) 討論時就可以問學生，他說的road是指什麼? 你覺得為什麼他要走很少人走過的路? Why? 註:這首詩有出現在我高中的英文課本裡喔!